Use of Both Serum Cystatin C and Creatinine as Diagnostic Criteria for Contrast‐Induced Acute Kidney Injury and Its Clinical Implications

BACKGROUND Contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) was traditionally defined as an increase in serum creatinine (sCr) after contrast media exposure. Recently, serum cystatin C (sCyC) has been proposed as an alternative to detect acute changes in renal function. The clinical implications of combining sCyC and sCr to diagnose CI-AKI remain unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS One thousand seventy-one consecutive patients undergoing coronary angiography/intervention were prospectively enrolled. SCyC and sCr were assessed at baseline and 24 to 48 hours after contrast media exposure. CI-AKI determined by sCr (CI-AKIsCr) was defined as an sCr increase greater than 0.3 mg/dL or 50% from baseline. Major adverse events at 12 months were assessed. CI-AKIsCr developed in 25 patients (2.3%). Twelve-month follow-up was available for 1063 patients; major adverse events occurred in 61 patients (5.7%). By receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, an sCyC increase of greater than 15% was the optimal cutoff for CI-AKIsCr detection, which occurred in 187 patients (17.4%). To evaluate the use of both sCyC and sCr as CI-AKI diagnostic criteria, we stratified patients into 3 groups: no CI-AKI, CI-AKI detected by a single marker, and CI-AKI detected by both markers. Multivariable logistic regression revealed that the predictability of major adverse events increased in a stepwise fashion in the 3 groups (no-CI-AKI group as the reference, CI-AKI detected by a single marker: odds ratio=2.25, 95% CI: 1.24-4.10, P<0.01; CI-AKI detected by both markers: odds ratio=10.00, 95% CI: 3.13-31.91, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Combining sCyC and sCr to diagnose CI-AKI would be beneficial for risk stratification and prognosis in patients after contrast media exposure.